FRC Team Graph

Network

Most Central Teams

Best positioned teams, by Jordan centrality

Most Critical Connections

Connections on the most shortest paths between teams

#	Team 1	Team 2	Bridge Score
1	1817	4476	481
2	118	1817	362
3	118	190	333
4	190	4561	315
5	118	229	294
6	401	6328	229
7	190	3309	225
8	422	1648	199
9	4476	7902	179
10	118	6574	179

Single Points of Failure

Teams that would split the network if removed

Furthest Teams

Team pairs with the most steps between them

#	Team 1	Team 2	Steps
1	7763	972	15
2	7763	2710	15
3	7763	3735	15
4	6341	972	15
5	6341	2710	15
6	6341	3735	15
7	972	5293	15
8	972	7890	15
9	972	2702	15
10	2710	5293	15

Most Connected Pairs

Team pairs with the most connections between them

#	Team 1	Team 2	Connections
1	111	112	10
2	118	10118	9
3	229	4124	8
4	229	5240	7
5	1058	3467	7
6	3847	8515	6
7	2910	4911	6
8	177	429	6
9	1119	1153	6
10	4795	4861	6

Islands

Groups of teams with no link to the main network

13 teams × 112 teams × 17 teams × 16 teams × 15 teams × 24 teams × 83 teams × 82 teams × 491 teams × 1

72 islands with 203 teams in total

Most Outgoing

Teams people most often leave for another team

Most Incoming

Teams people most often join from another team

Moves Between Regions

Most common moves from one region to another

#	From	To	Moves
1	Massachusetts	New Hampshire	20
2	New Hampshire	Massachusetts	19
3	New York	Massachusetts	16
4	Connecticut	Massachusetts	14
5	California	Massachusetts	10
6	New York	Connecticut	9
7	Connecticut	New York	7
8	Maryland	Virginia	7
9	Illinois	Iowa	7
10	Michigan	Texas	7

Regional Retention

Share of moves that stay in the region. Net flow is moves in from other regions minus moves out.

#	Region	Moves	Stayed Local	Net Flow
1	Texas	160	80.6%	+17
2	California	152	78.9%	+14
3	Michigan	150	76.7%	-15
4	Ontario	144	92.4%	-3
5	New York	120	60.8%	-22
6	North Carolina	118	91.5%	+8
7	Massachusetts	117	55.6%	+35
8	New Hampshire	85	51.8%	0
9	Connecticut	84	57.1%	-12
10	New Jersey	78	69.2%	-11